Alliance Hospital MD's Rights Violation: NAPTIP's Interpretation of Reps Committee Ruling Misleading*

Alliance Hospital MD's Rights Violation: NAPTIP's Interpretation of Reps Committee Ruling Misleading*
Alliance Hospital MD's Rights Violation: NAPTIP's Interpretation of Reps Committee Ruling Misleading*

 

The Interpretation by the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons NAPTIP concerning the outcome of the last proceeding by the house committee on public petitions investigating petition filed by Alliance hospital against NAPTIP for violating  the fundamental human rights of staff of the hospital is misleading and laced with inaccuracies. 

The position of the Director General of NAPTIP Dr Fatima Waziri who was scolded for misuse of her office and infringing on the fundamental rights of innocent citizens was summoned to appear before the committee on Thursday April 18. 

In a statement by the Media Consultant to Alliance Hospital Dada Joseph  he said the last proceeding was meant for the Director General of NAPTIP Dr Fatima Waziri to appear based on the summons issued against her following the petition of violation of fundamental human rights, flagrant abuse of her office against the Managing Director of Alliance Hospital Dr Christopher Otabor and three of the his staff. 

The summoned which was issued on her after the committee berated her for  inhuman act on march 7th, 2024 by the chairman of the house committee on public petition Honourable Emeka Etaba to appear on the 18th of April 2024, but knowing fully well that the committee will not spare her for violating the rights of the MD of Alliance Hospital, the DG quickly rushed to file a suit against him before the FCT high court on March 18th , 2024 barely 11 days after her summon 

At the resumed hearing on Thursday 18th April again the DG was absent and  sent her staff to inform the committee that the agency has instituted the matter before an FCT high court. 


The chairman of the committee who is a law abiding citizen, and who also holds the santity of the constitution ruled that since the matter is before the court, it will be subjudice for the committee to continue proceeding on the petition.

Write a Comment